Over the last forty-odd years, it has become fashionable to believe that human beings are born with detailed knowledge “hard wired” in their genes.
In particular, children are said to be quick at language-learning because they inherit a special language instinct which gives them most of what they need to know before they start. This idea was first argued by Noam Chomsky in the 1960s and 1970s; it has been popularized by Steven Pinker’s best-seller The Language Instinct.
The ‘Language Instinct’ Debate is a critique of this idea. It is an enlarged and revised edition of a book first published in Britain under the title Educating Eve. The new version, The ‘Language Instinct’ Debate, was published in March 2005; sales took off rapidly, so that it was already reprinted before the end of that year.
My book assesses the many arguments used to justify the language-instinct claim, and it shows that every one of those arguments is wrong. Either the logic is fallacious, or the factual data are incorrect (or, sometimes, both). The evidence points the other way. Children are good at learning languages, because people are good at learning anything that life throws at us — not because we have fixed structures of knowledge built-in.
A new chapter in this edition analyses a database of English as actually used by a cross-section of the population in everyday conversation. The patterns of real-life usage contradict the claims made by believers in a “language instinct”.
The new edition includes many further changes and additions, responding to critics and taking account of recent research. It has a preface by Paul M. Postal of New York University.
The ‘Language Instinct’ Debate ends by posing the question “How could such poor arguments have passed muster for so long?”
Some critical comment:
- the definitive response to Pinker’s book and Chomskyan nativism in general — a wonderful book ... should be required reading in a varied range of courses
- — Donald Carroll, on the Languse list (Temple University)
Well-argued. Sampson makes Chomsky’s (and Pinker’s) arguments for linguistic nativism seem pretty sophomoric.
- — Mark Tursi (New Jersey City University), on www.goodreads.com
makes a powerful case that linguistic nativism … risks looking to scientists in a hundred years like the search for phlogiston does to us now. … claims that linguistic nativism is less a theory than a cult start looking plausible.
- — John McWhorter, Language
a detailed, well-argued criticism of the nativist approach
- — Shuly Wintner, Alon Lavie, and Brian MacWhinney, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science
a devastating critique of Steven Pinker’s Language Instinct, exposing the intellectual flaws in the hypothesis that there is such a thing as Universal Grammar, and that it’s innate. It’s written in a style that’s just as accessible as The Language Instinct – so if you’ve read The Language Instinct, this is for you!
- — “Cath” of the Ninetysix and Ten blog
an impressive tour de force ... it does read very fluently and entertainingly ... many, if not all, of Sampson’s criticisms ... are persuasive
- — James Hurford, Journal of Linguistics
comprehensive, exhaustive, the product of ample research ... a most interesting and instructive book which I recommend to all linguists
- — Ernst Pulgram, Language
In his wonderful book … Geoffrey Sampson uses textual evidence from corpora very effectively to counter [Chomsky’s] argument for innateness.
- — David Hoover, Digital Humanities Quarterly
[a] devastating rebuttal of the linguistic theories of “nativism” in Stephen Pinker
- — Deirdre McCloskey, European Review of Economic History
I read Pinker’s book but it left me uncomfortable … Sampson’s book was a refreshing “Occam’s Razor” and I finished it feeling much more convinced of his side of the argument. It simply doesn’t rely as much on assumption and scientific legerdemain.
- — T. Smith (San Francisco), in Amazon customer reviews
The argumentation is clear, and quite compelling.
- — Bernard Smith, in Amazon customer reviews
The ‘Language Instinct’ Debate is published by Continuum, now an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing of London, New Delhi, New York, and Sydney. New or used copies available via relevant British or American Amazon pages.
ISBN 0 8264 7384 9 (hardback)
ISBN 0 8264 7385 7 (paper)
last changed 3 Dec 2012